Friday, September 21, 2012

The Rolling Stones

I don't like them. I don't like them at all. I maybe think that listening to the Rolling Stones after the Beatles was a bad idea, because now all I want to do is listen to more and more Beatles. I have seriously turned into one of those megafans, who if it was 1960, would be like freaking out in the crowd. The Beatles are always so cute and more safe, and the Stones sound dirty and not as experienced. I think the thing that makes me really not like them is Mick Jagger's voice. It is such a drastic change from the Beatles beautiful harmonies. One of the things I liked most about the Beatles was how well they sang together and how well thought out and perfect their harmonies were. It made all the lyrics sound incredible. But, Mick Jagger on the other hand just sounds gross and I could not even compare him to Paul McCartny (mostly because Paul is my love). I haven't really gotten to see the personality of the Stones, but I'm interested to find out, because after I saw the Beatle's documentary I loved them so much more. Maybe that will happen with the Stones. Some people say either Beatle's or Stones. I don't really agree with this because they sound completely different. It's not that I like the Beatle's when they are vs. the Stones , it's just that I like the Beatles and dislike the Stones, but not really comparing one to the other.

Here is a video of the Stones playing Tell Me:


All of them look so unhappy and serious it really bothers me. I just think they're kinda sketchy and think they're all that and "bad". Just a complete change from the Beatles, which is not good in my opinion.

No comments:

Post a Comment